September 2004 Archives

Freedom from hypocrites

| | Comments (0)

"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

- George W. Bush, Aug. 5, 2004

So...if, like our conservative friends keep reminding us, "freedom isn't free", why are they fighting so hard to avoid paying taxes, serve in the military, invest for personal gain without investing in America, pay for public education, infrastructure, etc.? And if they are so up on freedom, why are they so keen on silencing dissent as they restrict the rights of women, minorities, immigrants, gays, and social liberals who care more about their fellow man than their own pocketbooks? I don't seriously expect there to be any actual answers to these questions. Just wanted to get you started on some deep thinking today.

Apparently, the Bush administration is bad for children. And conservatives the likes of John Eisenhower are going for Kerry. (Since I'm name-dropping, Garrison Keillor has a good article on why we shouldn't vote for Bush.) International observers predict trouble with our election. Great, the polls haven't opened yet and we're being treated like a third world dictatorship; which isn't too far off the mark. Slate tackles the tricky logic of being Bush being unable to admit he's ever made a mistake. Frightening, especially considering people buy into it. And just in case you had doubts, a federal judge has ruled a part of the Patriot Act unconstitutional. Gee, go figure.

More families of dead soldiers are speaking out. Any sadistic GOP goons gonna accuse them of not being patriotic? And of course, most of us don't trust politicians anymore. Which probably isn't news to most of you. For humor's sake, Doonesbury takes on our color-coded terror alert nonsence in relation to the election.

If you are 35 or under, the New Voters Project is getting a list of questions together to send to Bush and Kerry to answer. Read about the project here. Also, read up on issues in key "battleground" states; we need a better term for that.

To end, some morons want to pull voting booths out of schools out of fear of a terrorist attack. Look, if you have been coerced by Bush & Co. to be that afraid of your own shadow, you should seriously reassess who you are voting for. The other side of the coin is this one, in which the Bush-Cheney junta might call up additional troops (re: Guardsmen) once the election is over. You know, pulling an unpopular stunt to solve a problem they refuse to admit exists. The GOP counters this is not the case, but they're a little low on the John Trust-o-meter these days, so pardon my skepticism.

And then there's TwoFacesofBush.com. Enjoy.

Not a part of a Redneck agenda

| | Comments (0)

Today's post is going to be slightly random and full of links of all kinds. Tom returned towards Iraq today. I'd like to thank everyone who, genuinely and without slogan-tossing, were nice enough to give my brother some kind words and encouragement while he was home.

Remember how Florida was going to clean up it's act and electronic voting machines would fix the mess of punch cards and hanging chads? Well, according to Jimmy Carter and others, Florida is STILL not addressing the problem. According to FOXNews (there, I linked from them...now get off my back) and via Slashdot, even a chimpanzee can hack a voting machine. And one hack blames recent hurricane patterns for the way the state voted last time. Which is not to say his information - if true - isn't still creepy.

Bonus quote from the Father Knows Best Department:

"To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us and make a broken tyrant into a latter-day hero ... assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator and condemning them to fight in what would be an un-winnable urban guerilla war. It could only plunge that part of the world into even greater instability."

- George H.W. Bush

1998

Oops.

That's not all Junior forgot about. There's also the pre-war assessment that warned of the current violence (use wallenfeldt and guest for access - and keep it handy, I have more Times stories following), which, like all actual intelligence was probably just ignored. As for the Arab issue, MSNBC tackles that here. And despite the lack of WMDs, despite any ties between Iraq and the people we actually should be fighting, Bush says he'd do it all over again. Unbelievable, coming from a man who swears he values life and personal dignity.

It's a sham people. Wake up.

Florida is asking where their National Guardmen are in their time of need. Women are asking why this administration threatens their social status (the site has more general info as well). Scientists oppose the administration for their Dark Ages approach to progress, especially as the government forces EPA employees to shut up as other agencies trade needed legislation for votes or just plain silence. Meanwhile the Bush administration attempts to take health care away from even more children even while they break federal laws in trying to reform Medicare. Tony Blair admits some fault in the run-up to war and even Colin Powell confesses to a bad situation as the lies about Iraq grow from the Oval Office and our troops do the best they can in an untenable situation. They even want to jack up the price of milk to get Wisconsin dairy farmers to vote for Bush (use wallenfeldt1 and visitor to login). You call this honest government? I call it BS and it has to stop.

Look, the guy can't even get an endorsement from his adopted hometown's newspaper (with saved PDF version in case the site goes down again). In the interest of fairness (find THAT on FOXNews, HA!) many residents are die-hard Bush supporters. Being mostly white ranchers and farmers with little to fear from the guy, I suppose I could see that. Almost. In an "I don't know anyone different nor want to" type mentality.

In all this, Bush supporters falsely claim that liberals are out to ban the Bible as they dragoon interested voters into working their phone banks. With all this screening, it appears George is just plain scared of hearing what real Americans have to say (use wallenfeldt and visitor). Pity, he could learn a lot from us, especially those who have lost family in his vendetta war. Plus, despite Bill O'Reilly's fantasyland claims that the Daily Show viewers are stoners, they are (disclaimer: WE watch it and are not pot smokers) more intelligent than the hate-filled Neanderthals that listen to his raving drivel. The Tulsa police did the honorable and legal thing and stood down when the Secret Service told them to arrest law-abiding Bush protesters. Of course, there's the whole thing where conservatives think they are the only patriots in this country, even as they cheer on a pack of tools tearing up our Constitution. Lovely.

Lies, coercion, avoidance, threats, anger, misrepresentation. This is neither moral nor ethical behavior. Some of you may still think I am making this up. But I'm not, and the weight of proof of this administration's disrespect for life, truth, and democracy is out their in droves. You just have to open your eyes.

And, apparently this month's Reader's Digest has an article letting people know their vote doesn't count. I can't find it online yet, but peruse a copy in your supermarket checkout aisle. You'll find it between fine publications like National Enquirer and Soap Opera Digest.

One last note. I heard a lot of people thank my brother for protecting their freedom with his service in Iraq. He never said anything about it - mostly because he can't given military orders - but I could tell the phrase commonly threw him off. I imagine it is the same for a lot of our armed forces members. So, I'll ask the question they can't - and probably wouldn't ask anyway. If we, by some awful measure, end up considering Iraq as a lost war, do we actually lose our freedom? It is a ludicrous statement, but bears inspection given the propaganda fueling the debate.

Or is that what is done merely by voting for Bush? Please, honor our troops service, but don't put the burden of one man's mania on their shoulders. They have enough concerns to deal with without any extra being placed on them.

Notes from the Heartland

| | Comments (0)

First off, best wishes to Lucas Seimers and the others injured in yesterday's attack. Sorry, short on info here and I want the news to get around to the family members first. Let's hope Irish treats you guys better than this in the long run. Keep hope alive guys.

As many of you know, I've been back in Illinois for the past few days visiting Tom while he's on leave. Got to spend some good quality time with him and have visited some familiar faces and gotten to meet some new ones.

One of the latter is Jim Doherty. You know him from the Galva Armed Services Yahoo group and we've emailed and spoken by phone before. Incidentally, Jim makes fantastic ribs, among with other foods. Really. Jim has oh-so-indelicately applied a boot to my backside and reminded me we only have a few more weeks to convince you, our readers, that we can grab our country back from pseudo-religious oil money thugs and their plan to burn up the Constitution. More from Jim later. Trust me, you'll enjoy it.

Alright, so I've been running into a lot of people who can't decide who to vote for this fall. They can't bring themselves to vote for Bush for all the obvious reasons but don't know what to think about Kerry. Which, judging by the TV ads they get here, I'm not surprised. I mean, damn, someone ought to call the DNC and focus some error correcting this way.

Anyways, let's make this a little easier and address these issues one at a time. My first issue, and its a big one, is this notion that Bush is a fine Christian fellow. Alright, let me break the bad news to you in the worst way possible. If you vote for Bush, you are giving a nuclear arsenal to a substance abuser. Not a recovering drunk or coke snorter, but an active breathing user in denial. How can I say this? Easy. The guy has no method for admitting fault and then working to correct any mistakes he may make. Had he been through an actual 12 step program, he'd know humility, responsibility, and remorse. NONE of these are evident in his behavior or in his reactions to events. Congratulations, this is akin to letting your children be schooled by a crack addict. Vote for that? Never.

Aside from that, this whole hateful approach to dealing with other religions (seriously, how many Muslims actually think Bush is working in their favor?) and other peoples (if you aren't white, you aren't part of the equation and I haven't seen anything that tells me differently) is definitively NOT part of what I'd call a healthy Christian agenda. The guy says he's pro-life and people are crazy enough to jump on his bandwagon and ignore the disdain for women's right (including taking the pill) and ah, heck, you get the idea. Seriously folks, its a bad choice. Bad for religion, bad for the country. (If you want links, I'll find some when I get better than a modem connection.)

Send me some questions you might want answered or issues to address. I'm not a policy expert or working for the Kerry campaign, but I'll try to find out what info you guys might want to know. Let's have a serious discussion on these things.

I have a few articles to pass along but that may wait until later days. For now, some partisan (what WAS he drinking) and humorous links from Jim Doherty, wrapping up with a horrible-but-probably-accurate image send by EvilNed.

1,000

| | Comments (0)

This is news I don't like to report, but when you hear Cheney's scare tactics on the TV, imagine what these goons have already done with almost four years under their belts. A thousand dead soldiers in Iraq and a polarized nation here at home. I don't think even sick amusement should let us give them more time to screw us over collectively.

You know, I've probably been a bit harsh with our Republican visitors of late. I owe you guys and gals an apology for not making a clearer distinction. Those of you who don't like big government programs and are worried about your pocketbooks have my mea culpa. I don't like the fact you ignore the needs of your fellow citizens, but that's something we can have an educated debate about. One we'd probably come to some agreements about as well. Well, kinda.

That said, please take the next 50-odd days to decide whether our current administration appeals to your needs as it trashes the Constitution and squanders our soldier's lives based on either faulty intel or just outright lies...take your pick. Don't just knee-jerk pull the GOP lever just because you are worried about some fantastical bogey-man Karl Rove conjured up. I'm not asking you to vote for Kerry outright, I am merely asking for you to measure the consequences of your actions and act accordingly. I haven't seen your agenda aided any more than my personal one over the past few years so I figured I'd put that out there...just in case you wanted to take your party back from the fringe elements you've got. Consider this your version of the '60s. Step up to the plate kids.

Speaking of not believing the hype, I want to re-evaluate the "who is the flip-flopper" syndrome. After the laughable "I'm a war president, WAIT, I'm a PEACE president" exchange awhile back, I figure Bush couldn't top that. I was wrong there too. Apparently we cannot win the War on Terror...WAIT!!! Yes we can. Finish what you started, bub. A plan would be nice too.

Slate has a slew of coverage related to the RNC. After watching Zell Miller's rant and the John McCain "I'm not a sellout, I just REALLY want to be president someday" speeches, I resorted to reading transcripts for a couple days. (Bonus hypocritical moment by Bob Dole.) Besides, I just really don't want to hear Mushmouth's voice more than I possibly need to; the upcoming debates being a few of those moments. Another Slate article by William Saletan that asks the question, "Isn't anyone going to actually pin some of these failures on Bush?" Seriously, the guy runs around pretending like nothing is ever his fault. He needs to be called on it. Before November would be nice.

Probably not news to most of you but I just heard a new term to describe those who think disagreeing with the junta-in-charge is un-American: Patriotically Correct. Which is just a nicer way of saying "We'd all be English if dissent were illegal." But it's better than calling them witch hunters or something.

Speaking of those who would silence those who dare oppose the New World Order II, here is a fine upstanding Republican woman literally silencing opposition, and one moron who kicked a protestor while she was on the ground detained by the Secret Service. Yeah, real nice people. Not to mention those who mock anyone who ever earned a Purple Heart.

News flash (not really). Apparently George was still snorting blow well into his daddy's presidency. He did it to relate to women. Huh? Granted, Kitty Kelley is not what you'd call an objective historian or anything, but hell, it's got to have more truth than what the Swift Boat goons are selling.

In Texas, the entire state educational system is getting left behind. Wait, didn't this bright idea get conjured up by Texans in the first place? And apparently, Bush is touting his economic policies as good for workers. On. What. Freaking. Planet?

This I just get sick joy from. A real big wish would mean the Yankees wouldn't even make the playoffs. Maybe in a couple more years.

And this story I've been waiting to be able to post for awhile. It's a story about plastic chairs. Really. Read it anyway.

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from September 2004 listed from newest to oldest.

August 2004 is the previous archive.

October 2004 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by Movable Type 4.1